Muslimin dan muslimat, insan ini bukan ulamak, namun dia tetap menunaikan solat iaitu kewajiban seorang muslim. Dia mengaku ilmu agamanya tidak sehebat Nik Aziz. Tetapi dialah yang mengerakkan negara Islam yang lain untuk membantu ketika umat islam di Bosnia disembelih oleh pengganas Serb.
Dia juga pernah menangis ketika melawat Bunker yang menjadi pejabat Yasser Arafat di Palestine. Ketika saudara islam yang berlainan parti mendoakan kecelakaan untuknya, dia dijemput oleh Allah SWT masuk ke dalam Kaabah.
Insan ni digelar MahaFiraun, dan dia jugalah yang lantang mengutuk kekejaman Zionis keatas umat islam serta mempertahankan islam dimata dunia. Dia tak hanya duduk berdoa tanpa berbuat apa-apa, dia berusaha untuk memajukan bangsa dan juga negaranya. Dia berkerja untuk semua rakyat Malaysia..
Yang menarik, dia tidak kemaruk nama, contohnya dia menolak kereta nasional dinamakan atas namanya. Begitu juga Putrajaya, sekolah, jalan dan bangunan seperti Menara Petronas,Yayasan atas nama dia pun ditolaknya.
Lihat saja Putrajaya, sebelum ni ada puak jumud tu nak jual kalau dorang menang Pilihanraya. Kononnya sebab membazir duit rakyat. Tapi sekarang ni mereka berebut nak duduk kat situ. Sekarang ni baru mereka tau, Putrajaya ni bukan sahaja berfungsi sebagai pusat Pentadbiran, tapi turut menjadi pusat pelancongan.
Cuba datang solat kat Masjid Putrajaya tu contohnya, ada sahaja bas pelancong yang datang. Jangan lupa juga macam-macam event bertaraf dunia diadakan di sana. Sebelum ni ada tak puak-puak jumud PAS terfikirkan benda-benda macam tu? Tapi Tun Mahathir dah fikir awal-awal lagi. Semua tu membawa keuntungan kepada rakyat.
Tun Mahathir berjuang dalam diam. Tak payah tabur janji satu negara, tak payah umpan syurga untuk cari sokongan, yang ni baru la 'The Truly' hero kepada negara Malaysia yang tercinta.
Sumber : Media Cyber
Penang Wasabi..
No benefit in keeping Pempena afloat
ReplyDeleteIn September last year, four directors of Pembangunan Perlancongan Nasional Sdn Bhd (Pempena) Datuk Yip Kum Fook (MCA GOMBAK, who is BAD name in Buddhist) Datuk Donald Lim Siang Chai, Syed Abdul Rahman and Jaigani Jaafar – were served with letters of demand for payment of more than RM12.4 million owed by the company.
The letters from lawyer Joginder Singh, who was acting for Kah Bintang Auto Sdn Bhd were sent by registered post. On receiving the letter, one of them, Lim, the former deputy toursim minister and current deputy finance minister, contacted the CEO of Pempena and asked him to act on the demand.
For a good eight months, nothing happened. No effort was made to contact the motor company or negotiate a settlement. Failing to get a response, Kah Bintang published notice of an intended winding up petition in two national newspapers on May 28. The petition was set to be heard on June 13.
At the hearing, the petition was undefended as neither Pempena nor its lawyers made an appearance. The court allowed the petition and asked that Pempena be given another 14 days to pay up. On June 27, that short lease of life for the company expired and Pempena ceased to exist.
Yesterday, akin to closing the stable door after the horses have bolted, Malaysian Tourism Board chairman Datuk Victor Wee announced that Pempena would be applying for a stay of the winding up order this week.
The decision, he said, was made after a meeting with the management of Pempena last Friday. A new solicitor will be appointed to apply for a stay and work out an amicable settlement.
He was responding to theSun’s front page report which said the High Court had ordered the company to be wound up after failing to pay RM12.4 million for the purchase of 120 units of Hyundai Sonata.
When asked if these actions and the subsequent embarrassment to the government could have been avoided if Pempena had complied or responded to letters from Kah Bintang and its lawyer, Wee declined to comment, saying: “This is something that only Pempena can answer.”
So, the questions are: “Why did the Pempena CEO ignore the letters, and the call from Lim who was then a director of the company? Was it incompetency or sheer arrogance or total defiance of a lawful directive? Why did Pempena not act after the notice was published?
More importantly, where is Pempena going to find RM13 million (including interests and costs) to pay the motor company? Why should it come from the tourism promotion budget when all fingers point to the directors, who by virtue of their positions should be held responsible for this fiasco?
There’s no benefit in keeping Pempena afloat as it has not contributed in anyway to enhance tourism and related products. In short, it has been bleeding financially and has become a burden to Tourism Malaysia.
The best option is to dispose the assets, settle the debts and close shop so that it does not lose more money. Throwing good money after bad does not make good business sense.
-thesundaily.